Friday, June 21, 2013

$6.7 Million Taxpayer Cost for Every One Job Created by Ontario’s Green Energy Plan






Another scandal and waste of taxpayer’s money thanks to the Ontario Liberal party’s government as it continues to be propped up by Ontario big labour movements and unionized workers party the NDP party!

Liberal party premier Kathleen Wynnes’ and former liberal Premier McGuinty’s energy deal with Samsung  was to create 16,000 new green energy jobs at taxpayer energy buy back cost of  $9.7 Billion for the original investment of $7 Billion by Samsung!

A $2.7 Billion taxpayer cost to secure a $7 Billion Samsung energy investment in Ontario for 16,000 green energy jobs!

Now, Samsung’s reduced investment is $5 Billion for the 900 green jobs with the taxpayers on the hook for an energy buyback of $6 Billion?

A $6 Billion taxpayer cost to secure a $5 Billion Samsung energy investment and 900 green energy jobs?

That works out now costing the taxpayers $6.7 Million for every ONE new green energy job for the 900 to be created by this downsized Samsung investment of $5 Billion at a taxpayer energy buyback cost of $6 Billion.  

Let’s recap for all to understand that the Ontario liberal-NDP coalition political party government has now decided that 900 green energy jobs shall cost $6 Billion to taxpayers in energy buyback costs over the next twenty years for a downsized Samsung investment of $5 Billion as a green energy investment in Ontario

A $6 Billion taxpayer cost to secure a $5 Billion Samsung energy investment and 900 green energy jobs?

Instead of 16,000 new jobs at a taxpayer cost of $9.7 Billion in green energy buybacks this Liberal-NDP coalition political party government has decided that 900 green energy jobs shall now cost $6 Billion in energy buy back costs over the next twenty years from Samsungs $5 Billion downsized investment in Ontario?

In other words, $6.7 Million taxpayers’ must fork out for ONE green energy job out of the total 900 jobs!   


This Ontario liberal-NDP coalition political party government lacks, accountability, transparency, ethics along with any moral right to continue governing considering all current and past scandals and mismanagement coupled with the current lack of meaningful legislative oversight, in my opinion.  
Sources:






Wednesday, June 19, 2013

Mayor's Charged Assaulter Sends E Mail Story to Toronto Star?



Open Letter to Toronto Mayor's Alleged Assaulter's Lawyer, Law Society and Toronto Star. 


For your client to send an email to the media via the Toronto Star as reported by one Carys Mills an employee of the Star is itself far more inappropriate and unfortunate than any comments alleged by yourself to have been utter by the Mayor concerning your clients alleged and independently witnessed assault against the Mayor of Toronto. 


It is my opinion  that your client's side of any story relating to her being charged with assault has one place only to be heard and that is in the courts and not through the media and I am sure that the law society would overwhelmingly agree.

Therefore as a lawyer and member of the law society, you must be fully cognizant of the fact that it is not the Mayor, the media or any other citizen that allows Ms. Everett to have her day and yours in the court in front of a judge to plead her story or case.

It has already been widely publicized in the media and not the courts that your client is allegedly a creative and very intelligent person, according to one Jesse LaFleur himself an alleged former high school acquaintance. 

One would conclude that in our civil society, whether your client has never been involved with the police prior to this charge as reported by the media, a supposedly educated, intelligent or level headed individual would not find herself or himself charged for assault against another human if they had full control of their faculties?

Finally this is all about your client’s credibility and perhaps those individuals who might have witnessed the alleged assault and NOT the victim who in this case apparently was the Mayor of Toronto.  

To quote, Justice J..E. Scanlan, “guilt or innocence is NOT based on rumours, speculation or reputation. An accused is not tried in the media, courts or public opinion based on what he/she may have done before rather the evidence to the matter in issue”

In my humble opinion as a mere mortal, lately unprofessional conduct be it by lawyers, editorials, journalistic stories have unfortunately forgone any sense of professionalism and basic human decency. 

Perhaps it is because of their distinct motives based on their particular political ideologies and philosophies and to heck with the laws!

I am not sure but it sure seems that way of late.

Warmest regards,

Peter Clarke

Toronto

Source

Wednesday, June 12, 2013

Syria's Revolutionary Civil War being Orchestrated and Propelled by Outside Interest?




With the civil war continuing to rage on in Syria, the world has a situation similar to what happened in Libya and Egypt.

With the Arab Muslim spring uprisings and the revolutionary civil war uprisings in Libya and Egypt it has become increasingly clearer that two goals of such uprisings were to establish Sharia law by incorporating Islam as the state religion and to achieve financial control of the country’s oil resources or the country itself in the case of Egypt.

The ancient Arabic translation of Sharia law relates to a path to the water hole and considering today’s position could cause the route to the oil holes? 

Syria’s oil and gas reserves opposite to those of Egypt and Libya remains a top-secret of its duly elected government and Islam is not currently the state religion.

Now Syria currently produces some 401,000 barrels of oil per day compared to the 662,600 (bbl/day) produced by Egypt and the 1.789 million (bbl/day) of oil produced by Libya

The so-called Syrian opposition, is made up of armed forces deserters, Syrian exile members of the de facto groups like the SNC (Syrian national council), FSA (free Syrian army) and non Syrian fanatic extremists for a free Palestine along with the Muslim brotherhood for Sharia law and all are doing battle against the Assad regime and the Syrian people.

A fraudulent unelected group of individuals, mainly from foreign countries, who call themselves the Syrian National Council claiming to be the opposition forces for the protection of the unarmed citizens of Syria and its resources.  

For the record the creation of the SNC was publicly reported not from within Syria but from Istanbul Turkey. Its members are listed @

We should also be aware of other groups like the Syrian American Council and the Free Syrian Army which is made up of deserters from Syria’s armed forces. 

The world witnessed desertions from Syria’s armed forces on the basis of clan alignment and radical Islamic religious beliefs? 

When military personnel go AWOL and put on masks and commence massacring their former comrades in uniform they are committing treason against the same people they took an oath and swore to protect against such lawlessness and anarchy?

These deserters for their deception and treasonous acts are now subject to appropriate military rule for these traitorous actions and killings and must be held liable?

Under a banner of the SNC or FSA the opposition force, for the protection of the unarmed citizens of Syria and its resources as they previously stated, have been and continue to kill innocent woman, children, youth and the elderly all Syrian people?

Recent bombings in Damascus, that have the fingerprint tactics used by al- Qaeda, fundamentalist Sunni Muslim terrorists groups and others from throughout the region in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Egypt and Jordan, by these heavily armed opposition forces comprised of rebels, insurgents, army deserters and terrorists can attest to the Syrian government’s claim that Syria is fighting Islamist militants steered from abroad!

How can Canada, the USA and other western powers support such radical extremists and fanatical religious non elected but self-anointed individuals and armed forces deserters and terrorists who call themselves the opposition and then proceed to intentionally detonate 10 kilos of highly flammable explosives in the centre of Damascus next to a primary school, shops and a mosque?

The UN and elected governments acceptance of condoning such treasonous acts, committed by deserters from the Syrian government’s armed force, based on their opinion that the elected Syrian government has “lost their legitimacy” and that “the free Syrian army of deserters will work hand in hand with the people to bring the regime down, protect the revolution and the country’s resources” says it all.

I think that we in the west, along with the rest of the world, must start questioning statements issued from Syrian exiles in France, Turkey, the
United States, Canada and throughout the Middle East and Africa

It remains my position that this civil war in Syria is definitely under the domestic jurisdiction of the state of Syria and as such it is time that France, Turkey, USA, Britain, Canada, Libya, Egypt, Iran, the displaced Palestine's fighters and all others to butt out of the internal domestic affairs of Syria and stop their attempts at legitimizing the SNC as the official opposition of the Republic of Syria.

If the elected Syrian regime is doomed then the Republic of Syria along with its' constitution and all legal citizens of Syria shall once again be controlled and governed through outsiders and outside interests. The establishment of Sharia law most likely would then follow in my humble opinion as the world is witnessing throughout the Middle East after the so called Arab spring uprisings!  


What kind of religion asks or demands that you blow yourself up to kill others from another tribe of the same religion in the name of a revolution, uprising for political power or God and Allah?

Syrian opposition and rebels an unelected de fact group, dominated by al-Qaida, jihadists, funded by Qatar, Turkey, Egypt, Libya, and Saudi Arabia, who commit an equal number of war crimes and atrocities against the Syrian citizens as the current duly elected Assad regime.

The Obama administration and the American government now want to arm these tribal sectarian fighters    

Latest Canadian position

No arms for Syrian rebels, Canadian government states.


Up Dates:

Geneva 2: Not Much Hope for Peace in Syria Author / Source / Date: 
Prabir Purkayastha, June 1, 2013

 

http://newsclick.in/international/geneva-2-not-much-hope-peace-syria

Islamists auction off cars to buy Syrian rebels heat-seeking missiles-Toronto Star


http://www.thestar.com/news/world/2013/06/28/islamists_auction_off_cars_to_buy_syrian_rebels_heatseeking_missiles.html

Sources: 
Public documents from BBCUK news, United Nations, Toronto Sun, and numerous media outlets, web sites, thanks to all.


Friday, May 31, 2013

Premier Wynne’s Transit Tax Addiction Historic or Mismanagement?


Have political party’s and their puppet representatives all gone mad or obsessed with anonymous sources of gossip; hearsay and pollsters?

The liberal party’s government through their transit agency Metrolinx and Wynne as Premier insist on advising us that such increased and new taxes are “paramount in improving peoples quality of life” along with other career politicians supported by the socialists' media corporations tell us tax increases and new taxes represent a “historic and high point of civic or provincial vision and responsibility?”

Her government’s support for proposed new taxes for “improving people’s quality of life” would result in a lifetime of increased and new taxes.  In addition to the average Jane and Joe family of four who already has to fork out 42.7% or ($31, 646) from an income of $74,113 for existing government taxes.

69% of Ontarians Do Not Support gasoline tax increases that Kathleen Wynne’s and her liberal political party’s government’s agency Metrolinx has proposed!

66% further on average Do Not Support any new or increased taxes for Metrolinx $50 Billion big move GTHA transit plan, according to a Forum research tool?

It is obvious that Ontario taxpayers are not buying into this latest proposed tax grab to pay for the Provinces $50 Billion big moves for 32 minutes in future congestion time savings?

Not when the middle-class Jane and Joe Ontario family is already paying $31,646 in government taxes considering and that the Ontario’s portion from the 39.47 cents per litre of existing gas taxes was supposedly solely for public transit, highways and bridges but found its way into the governments’ general revenues over the past 10 years or longer.

For the last 35 years the Provincial members of the legislature, the Federal members of parliament who represent their political parties throughout the Province and the GTHA, along with Toronto councillors and the TTC, ALL have not been able to come up with a meaningful and lasting funding arrangement that includes public transit and our existing highways and bridges!

It seems of late that they all are more consumed with unsubstantiated and legally unverifiable media stories generated by anonymous sources based on hearsay and gossip? While the Province’s operating debt contuses spiralling out of control to the tune of $281 Billion in debt!

How any taxpaying Ontarian, regardless of political party preference, in their right mind could continue supporting this liberal party’s government’s relentless addictive substance spending abuse coupled with their $3 Billion mismanagement of our current tax dollars with the likes of the politically cancelled gas plants, on top of E. Health fiscal, Orange fraud, Energy stupidity and Chemo Drug disaster simply defies logic let alone common sense, in my humble opinion.  

If any politician is worried, as the Premier of this Province would have you believe it most definitely should not be about press generated gossip and hearsay allegations, that have not been dealt with through the justice system but rather a mob rule mentality of public opinion, then it should be about the financial affairs of the Province, The city of Toronto and overall increasing operating debts of municipalities across Ontario.   

Prior to our oversized figure of a Mayor, which medical speaking is no fault of his own, and his administration political policies based on fiscal transparency and fiscal responsibility, the city’s spending increased by 60% while inflation rose by 23% over the same ten year period.

A $1.9 Billion one year increase in operating debt through spending from the current debt of $9.8 Billion to $11.7 Billion in debt for 2014 is how this Premier’s provincial administration kicked started her political agenda for the taxpayers of Ontario. Which now brings Ontario’s overall debt to $281 BILLION dollars that shall fall on the shoulders of our youth as taxpayers for the next three to four generation or longer.

Why is it that the media is not worried about the Ontario legislature and its financial turmoil that has cost BILLIONS of dollars and as a political party government continues to be out of control?

Personally, would have to agree with councillor Ford, the Mayors brother that this Premier and new liberal party leader “should take care of the problems that she has at Queens Park, right now.”  

When shall someone tell this liberal party and its leader that the majority of Ontario taxpayers think it would be far better if she were able to deal with her political party’s continued substance addiction of spending and increasing taxpayers debt at an out of control rate?   

Keep in mind that the corporate tax rate remains at 11.5% compared to average Jane and Joe’s middle-class family taxes of 42.7%!  

Get the picture why Toronto’s media corporations are hooked on allegations of crack gossip and hearsay from anonymous sources and self-proclaimed drug dealers?  

Any new or increased taxes for transit or congestion must come from an increase in the corporate tax rate by 1% or 3% and must include a transit tax on unions and banks.  

The people have spoken! It is scandalous to ask Ontarians or Torontonians to suck-up yet another little new sales tax increase of 1%, that over the years would quickly become 5% or more, would not come close to the annual BILLIONS of dollars needed to fund any new subways, let alone LRT’s or the current infrastructure requirements for existing operations and never-ending fare and salary increases of the TTC is scandalous.

Especially considering that my proposal for a 1%-3% corporate tax increase for transit congestion levy on all Banks, Unions and corporations operating in Canada and Ontario could generate $6 Billion annually for all existing public transit in Canadian cities including Toronto!


Source



Tuesday, May 28, 2013

Metrolinx’s Future Liberal Ontario is New & Increased Taxes on Families & Individuals but NOT for Corporate Taxes?






With the latest and final report from the liberal party government’s Transportation agency, Metrolinx, it’s no wonder why Toronto’s media is hooked on reporting daily stories from their anonymous sources about alleged crack gossip and hearsay!

That way they can distract the voters and taxpayers daily attention away from the next tax grab by this liberal government under the guise of transit funding for the GTHA.

And conceivably diverting said new and increased taxes to balance the books for their never-ending and unsustainable socialized liberal programs due to lack of any specific legislation that might demand otherwise!

Metrolinx’s proposed tax gouging recommendations are in the Full


A quick recap shows Ontarians that $50 Billion for 32 minutes and 400 kilometres of streetcar LRT lines but No new highways to offset the $1,600 dollars, families, with cars one assumes, apparently spends a year for the cost of highway or public transit congestion?

This proposed lifetime of tax increases on our youth and elderly for generations yet to come for such public transit has been hailed by the current liberal party Premier Kathleen Wynne as “paramount in improving peoples’ quality of life”?  

Hopefully in a democratic society such as ours, providing this liberal government does not once again prorogue the legislature for political purposes, you and I as the Joe taxpaying citizens shall be the ultimate judge of such proposed political party tax increase through our votes.   

Is this Hilarious or Historic? 

The final recap shows us, this “historic and high point of civic or provincial vision and responsibility,” as stated by lifelong career politicians and media corporations. 

A lifetime of increasing and new taxes on individuals and families but not corporations taxes, banks or multinational union organizations. 

Results in a 9% sales tax, on top of the current 5% GST, and 25.7 cents per litre transit gasoline tax (5 cent increase) plus a 25 cents per day on those commercial parking lots based on property values, a 15% increase on development charges that shall increase without a doubt the price of a new condo or hose by the same amount and to get us all from driving our cars or remain taking go trains, LRT’s or subways a daily $2 to $4 dollar increase for parking? 

Oh, I forgot a new land value capture along with current or future transit lines!    

This Plan that Wynne’s Provincial agency Metrolinx presented has No guarantee that additional and new taxes shall be specifically for transit purposes!

Get the picture of why Toronto’s media is hooked on crack gossip and hearsay stories from their anonymous sources!


Sources;



































































Monday, May 27, 2013

Citizen Protection from Anonymous Media Sources based on Gossip, Hearsay or Allegations Required.





Under our Charter of Rights; Freedoms and the Canadian Constitution the rights of all citizens must be protected, be they non-public figures or elected representatives of the public and all are to be presumed innocent until legally and beyond any reasonable doubt in a court of law found otherwise.

Recently media corporations, such as the Globe and Mail, the Toronto Star and Gawker blog, with their editorials, reporting and story journalism being based on gossip, hearsay and anonymous dubious sources that cannot be independently legally verifiable and would not be judicially acceptable in our courts of law, in my opinion, have adequately shown the media must be reigned in and clamped down on by legislation for such muckraking at the direct expense of any individuals citizen’s character and that of the family, spouse and children.


Mob rule public opinion guilt spread through muckraking bulling editorials and journalistic news-making stories or gossip blogs are neither reliable, relevant or permitted evidence on issues before the courts. Such unproven allegations should NOT be allowed “to go to press” in public or private newsprint media. 

Such legislation must be enacted to protect the personal reputations of all Canadian individuals, their spouse, family and children from media corporations rush to judgment and opinions based on allegations from scurrilous anonymous sources of gossip; hearsay and theory as offered up as editorial opinions and journalistic stories.

The personal reputation of every Canadian from whatever province they reside or make their living must be shielded from story generated journalism and reporters acting like legally constituted police investigator or officers of our judicial system which they are not.

To quote Justice J.E. Scanlan, “guilt or innocence is NOT based on rumour, speculation or reputation. An accused is not tried” (in the media, courts or public opinion)” based on what he/she may have done before” rather “ the evidence related to the matter in issue.”

In my opinion, unprofessional editorials and journalistic stories lately have forgone any sense of professionalism or basic human decency. 

Perhaps it is because of their own or their employers’ distinct motives as based on their particular political ideologies and philosophies, 

I am not sure but it seems that way.


Sources





Sunday, May 26, 2013

Citizen Protection from Anonymous Media Sources based on Gossip, Hearsay or Allegations Required.









Under our Charter of Rights; Freedoms and the Canadian Constitution the rights of all citizens must be protected, be they non-public figures or elected representatives of the public, and all are to be presumed innocent until legally and beyond any reasonable doubt in a court of law found otherwise.

Recently media corporations, such as the Globe and Mail, the Toronto Star and Gawker blog, with their editorials, reporting and story journalism being based on gossip, hearsay and anonymous dubious sources that cannot be independently legally verifiable and would not be judicially acceptable in our courts of law, in my opinion, have adequately shown the media must be reigned in and clamped down on by legislation for such muckraking at the direct expense of any individuals citizen’s character and that of the family, spouse and children.


Mob rule public opinion guilt spread through muckraking bulling editorials and journalistic news-making stories or gossip blogs are neither reliable, relevant or permitted evidence on issues before the courts. Such unproven allegations should NOT be allowed “to go to press” in public or private newsprint media.

Such legislation must be enacted to protect the personal reputations of all Canadian individuals, their spouse, family and children from media corporations rush to judgment and opinions based on allegations from scurrilous anonymous sources of gossip; hearsay and theory as offered up as editorial opinions and journalistic stories.

The personal reputation of every Canadian from whatever province they reside or make their living must be shielded from story generated journalism and reporters acting like legally constituted police investigator or officers of our judicial system which they are not.



To quote Justice J.E. Scanlan, “guilt or innocence is NOT based on rumour, speculation or reputation. An accused is not tried” (in the media, courts or public opinion)” based on what he/she may have done before” rather “ the evidence related to the matter in issue.”

In my opinion, unprofessional editorials and journalistic stories lately have forgone any sense of professionalism or basic human decency. 

Perhaps it is because of their own or their employers’ distinct motives as based on their particular political ideologies and philosophies, 

I am not sure but it seems that way.

                                                                                      
Source